Emphasis Added


August 2004
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31        
Jul   Sep


 

TOPICS WE DISCUSS HERE:

 

 

 

EA'S GREATEST RANTS
Art, Spectacle and Terrorism
Car Porn
Freedom is not a Handout
Livy It Up
Guard Rails and Guard Towers
The Proud Tower
Who Needs Democracy?
The Axis of Ignorance
Shadow of a Dowd
Fox on the Run
Just Another Word for Nothing Left to Lose
Tit for Tat (Rob vs. WSJ)
What Price Victory?
The First Casualty
The Guns of Baghdad
New Europe/Old Europe
Is it Even Worth Asking Bush for Reasons?
War and Peace
Amiri Baraka: Righteous Dope
My Country Right or ?
Liberal Media - Myth & Reality
Matters of Life and Death
Dockworker’s Strike
Who’s “Out of Touch,” WSJ?
Post-Election Analysis
Failures of Direct Democracy
Prison Guard Unions a Problem for Dems

 

 

 

 

Book Reviews

Plateforme by Michel Huellebecq
Guarding Hanna by Miha Mazinni
Unholy Wars by John Cooley
The Inquisition of the Middle Ages by Henry Lea
H.P. Lovecraft: An Appreciation
The Filth by Grant Morrison
I Was Seven in '75 by Ellen Forney
Supernatural Law by Batton Lash
Lies  by Al Franken
 
 
Who is Brian Duffy?

(and why is he saying these terrible things on this site?)

 

Wednesday, August 18, 2004

The Big Question

Reaganite Dick Wirthlin raises an interesting point on today’s New York Times Op-Ed page, suggesting that Kerry may be planning to use Ronald Reagan’s famous question from 1980 – “Are you better off today than you were four years ago?” – to devastating effect against George W. Bush. Wirthlin argues, rather unconvincingly in my estimation, that Bush should (and, more problematically, can) “inoculate himself in a venue widely viewed by voters, at a time of his own choosing.”

 

Easier said than done. The problem with the Big Question is that is has so many nasty dimensions. “Better off” is vague, but consider this:

  • Do you feel safer than you were four years ago?
  • Is your financial position as good as it was four years ago?
  • Do you feel as good about your job and your prospects as you did four years ago?
  • Are your kids getting a better education than they were four years ago?
  • Is your health care coverage better than it was four years ago?
  • Is the environment cleaner? Big corporations more responsible?

By practically any measure, the quality of life for average Americans has declined. Needless to say, not all of this is Bush’s fault. Of course, many of the problems of the late 70s weren’t Jimmy Carter’s fault either, but he, like Bush, could plausibly be accused of not doing all he could to fix them, or simply not having the right approach and mindset to do what was necessary. For better or worse, when our elections turn on “issues” rather than sideshow personal attacks, this is how people judge.

 

I have been waiting all spring and summer for Kerry to start asking these questions in precisely this way. It’s the classic challenger strategy when things are bad, and it forces Bush to explain and make excuses (as he has been doing on the economy since 2002), stripping him of some of the advantages of incumbency. And frankly, some of the questions have no good answers for Bush. Wirthlin can pontificate about rhetorical tactics, but that doesn’t solve the substantive problem.

 

So far, the stock Republican answer to all attempts to make unfavorable comparisons of the present with the go-go 90s is that “9/11 changed everything.” There are three main problems with this.

 

  1. It’s only partially true. The attack was probably beyond anyone’s control, but our response to it has been driven by political imperatives far more than by prudent policy. There is plenty of room to disagree about the effectiveness of our response and the success (or lack thereof) Bush has had in mitigating the economic repercussions three years after the event.
  2. It’s getting old. Republicans have been using this line since 9/12, and it has lost meaning in repetition, especially when it is used in such absurd contexts as trying to justify the ban on importing cheaper drugs from Canada.
  3. Most damagingly, like most hard realities, it’s pessimistic. 9/11 was terrifying. It’s human nature to want to put that behind us, go on with life as usual, even if that’s not a sensible option. Republicans often win by making appeals to irrational aspirations, suggesting utopian benefits to crackpot ideas like doing away with the IRS, mandating prayer in public schools, or privatizing social security. The tactic is to make opponents look like dreary defenders of the status quo, lacking vision and imagination. A great many people want to buy into the fantasy and reject the harder reality, despite the inevitable consequences. By harping on 9/11 as the justification for everything from police-state legislation to irrelevant wars to abortion (as Alan Keyes recently suggested), the GOP is taking the role of the dour realist, nagging and scolding the public not to forget difficult lessons, leaving Kerry and the Democrats an opening to implicitly promise to heal the pain of 9/11 rather than continuing to wallow in it.

Wirthlin is right. Bush has a problem. America is less prosperous, less safe, less clean, less free and diminished in the eyes of the world, and these things happened on Bush’s watch. If Kerry doesn’t start asking the question, someone damn well should.


10:24:48 AM    Emphasize This! []

Click here to visit the Radio UserLand website. © Copyright 2004 Rob Salkowitz.
Last update: 9/27/2004; 5:56:53 PM.
Emphasis Added Theme designed by Andrew Lueck and Rob Salkowitz.

 

GUILT BY ASSOCIATION
Rayne Today
Secular Blasphemy
Different Strings
Pesky the Rat
Why Your Wife Won't Have Sex
How to Save the World
Fried Green Al Qaedas
Rich Pure and Simple (Minded)
Patriotically Incorrect
Filtchyboy
Miss Feva
Catnmus
Dave Cullen
Dick Jones Patteran Pages
FIONA
Reflections
The Barbaric Yawp
Real Live Preacher
Andrew Bayer
Blog Baby
Ken Dow
Paulapalooza
No Code
Radio Free Blogistan
Daihatsu Graceland
World O'Crap
Dr. Omed
Al Hedstrom
Paul Andrews
 
 
METABLOG:
Virtual Occuquan
 

POLITICS

Buzzflash
Josh Marshall
Ruy Teixeira
Daily Kos
Atrios
CalPundit
Mark Kleinman
Steve Gilliard
Billmon
Liberal Oasis
The Left Coaster
Oliver Willis
Ernie the Attorney
South Knox Bubba
Ken Layne
Sadly, No
Nathan Newman
Interesting Times
USS Clueless
Juan Cole
Matt Yglesias
Taegan Goddard
Happy Carpenter
 
MEDIAWATCH
Eric Alterman
Daily Howler
Mediawhores
Busy Busy Busy
Cursor
 
IDEAS
Christopher Hitchens
Paul Krugman
Arts and Letters Daily
Orcinus
New Republic
 
NEWS 'n VIEWS
The Economist
New York Times
Slate
The Nation
Reason
Washington Monthly
WSJ Opinion Journal
National Review
AlterNet
IndyMedia
Guardian UK
Seattle P-I
Seattle Times
Stateline
The Hill
The Agonist
 
FICTION
Neil Gaiman
William Gibson
Scala House Press
Harlan Ellison
Warren Ellis
Arkham House
Peter David
Grant Morrison
 
 

 

OBSESSIONS
Min's Dragnet Records
USS Mariner
Baseball Prospectus
ComiCon.com
TalkLeft
FilmThreat
The Stranger
 
 
 

 

Ads 'n Ends


 



Site Meter

Blogroll Me!


Proud to be a member of BlogSnob!

Rate Me on BlogHop.com!
the best pretty good okay pretty bad the worst help?


Is my Blog HOT or NOT?

Click here to visit Blogster.Net - Top Blogs!

< £ Salon Bloggers & >




Subscribe to "Emphasis Added" in Radio UserLand.

Click to see the XML version of this web page.

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.